Qiao Sun, Hong-bo Hu
INVESTIGATION AND PILOT COMPARISON OF LOW INTENSITY SHOCK CALIBRATION BY LASER INTERFEROMETRY
This paper first presents the investigation work of the pilot comparison of low intensity shock calibration by laser interferometry. Two main technical concerns for a possible comparison are variety of primary shock calibration systems covered and feasibility of comparison artifact investigated. For the primary calibration system, homodyne or heterodyne laser interferometer is included as measurement standard, but the mechanical excitation is of three different types: hammer-anvil collision, pneumatic driven projectile impact and Hopkinson bar. The shock pulses generated are smooth monopole shape (half-sine or sine squared) by the first two types with air bearings, but dipole shape by the third type. For the comparison artifact, a standard accelerometer of single-ended type with a charge amplifier consists of an accelerometer measuring chain whose nonlinearity of amplitude and phase frequency responses is investigated. Based on the nonlinear fact of comparison artifact at frequency domain and the spectrum range difference of mechanical excitations of the calibration system, strict comparison conditions had to be laid down for measurement of shock sensitivity at specific acceleration levels and pulse durations. For the monopole excitation, the comparison acceleration range is from 500 m/s² to 5000 m/s² and pulse duration is from 0.3 ms to 3 ms, with the reference of 2 ms at an acceleration of 1000 m/s². For the dipole excitation, the acceleration level is fixed as 1000 m/s² and pulse duration is from 0.03 ms to 0.2 ms, with the reference of 0.1 ms.
The pilot comparison of low intensity shock calibration, coded as APMP.AUV.V-P1, is successfully organized by Technical Committee of Acoustics, Ultrasound and Vibration (TCAUV) of Asia Pacific Metrology Program (APMP). Some comparison results of both monopole excitation and dipole excitation are shown with the expanded uncertainty. The degrees of equivalence calculated from the measurement results by the four participants support the uncertainty of measurement reported by them. The completion of this pilot comparison can serve as part of the basis for a planned key comparison targeted at a low intensity shock range at Consultative Committee level.